John Burdick

So you drive a pink rustbucket Chevy Vega, Dervish? It shows what kind of poor judgement you have in cars. And by the way, the Pinky Toot Toot is a pink 2013 Honda Civic that belongs to your buttboy John Burdick (This One). Johnny's nephew Timmy likes to take it out for joyrides around Syracuse NY, cutting explosive farts after yelling "TOOT TOOT" in front of crowds. Timmy usually gets his cousin Benjamin to give him the spare keys to the Pink Civic. Beanie Toot Toot and Timmy Toot Toot cruise the streets of Syracuse NY, ripping farts around town. May 22, 2019 at 12:37 PM.

Rosanne Barr Is A Racist Nut

To think, I used to like Barr. But she has obviously allowed herself to be brainwashed by the leader of the Orange Turd Cult.

Roseanne Barr calls #MeToo accusers hoes, slams Sen. Kamala Harris, Christine Blasey Ford.
Roseanne Barr didn't hold back on the #MeToo movement in a new off-the-rails interview, launching a verbal attack on Sen. Kamala Harris and other women in the process.

The 66-year-old comedian -- who was axed from the hit "Roseanne" reboot in May following a racist tweet -- sat down with conservative commentator Candace Owens, where she mocked sexual assault accusers and the #MeToo movement "witch hunt".

"If you don't run out the room … but you stayed around because you're like, 'I thought maybe he was going to give me a writing job', well, you ain't nothing but a ho", Barr said during an episode Sunday of "The Candace Owens Show", after asking why women were in men's hotel rooms late at night.

Barr and Owens compared the feminist movement to white supremacy, while Barr added that #MeToo accusers are "pretending that they didn't go to trade sexual favors for money".

"I know a ho when I see one", Barr exclaimed. "They need to be called out … That's privilege, too -- ho privilege".

The outspoken comedian then lashed out against Sen. Kamala Harris, nicknaming her "Kama Sutra Harris."

"We all know what she did … she slept her way to the bottom", Barr said, referring to the senator's former relationship with ex-San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown. link

Video: Mar 3, 2019. Roseanne Barr joins Candace Owens for an in-depth conversation on the world premiere of The Candace Owens Show. They discuss the aftermath of the controversy that lead to Roseanne’s primetime sitcom being cancelled, the 2016 election, the MeToo movement and much more!

Tweets About Treason

The following are tweets from March 12 and March 13 concerning trumper treason. Treasonish in that the actions being tweeted about concern collusion with Russia to elect and (later) to protect the Putin puppet, d0nald tRump.

This first one is from Malcolm Nance, author of The Plot To Hack America. Wikipedia says the "non-fiction book... [is] about what the author describes as Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections".

"What the author describes" must be some of that "liberal bias" Conservatives complain exists in online resources and fact checking sites. Although Malcolm is a (former Republican). In this tweet, Malcolm talks about the recent House "investigation" into whether or not Russia tried to influence our elections and whether or not d0nald tRump colluded with Russian operatives.

One year ago I predicted America was entering a "Benedict Arnold moment". Little did I know it would be a "Benedict Arnold Movement". #RussianRepublicans

— Malcolm Nance (@MalcolmNance) March 13, 2018

House Republicans, with their sham investigation (headed up by the "recused" tRump stooge Devin Nunes) are participating in a "Benedict Arnold MOVEMENT". They are all traitors, in other words. The "Benedict Arnold moment", btw, that Nance references concerns Trump and his campaign colluding with Russia.

Which is NOT to say that Nance believes anyone (tRump, people who were a part of the Trump campaign or Congressional Republicans protecting Trump) will be charged with treason. That is highly unlikely. Even if their actions could RIGHTLY be described as treasonous.

Dictionary.com defines treason as "a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state". Section 3 of article 3 of the Constitution more narrowly defines treason. Basically, because we are not in a declared war with Russia, tRump and associates can't (and won't) be charged with treason.

But, as per the non-Constitutional definition, my verdict is guilty. Or, it sure as hell looks like there is treason here. tRump and associates were quite eager to collude with Russia and their cut-out, WikiLeaks.

My reference to WikiLeaks as a Russian cut-out, which is "in espionage parlance... a mutually trusted intermediary, method or channel of communication that facilitates the exchange of information between agents", is via Malcolm Nance. As per a 10/2/2016 Nance tweet "WikiLeaks is a Russian intelligence run cybercrime laundromat".

But back to the trumpy treason. As per the authors of the new book, Russian Roulette by Michael Isikoff and David Corn, Vice President (at the time) Joe Biden used the word after being presented with Christopher Steele's dossier.

This tweet is "not found"...

"If this is true, it's treason". Vice President Joe Biden's reaction to learning the full scope of Russian interference in the 2016 election and interactions with people in trumpworld. Just one revelation from @DavidCornDC and @Isikoff's new book Russian Roulette. #maddow -- Joy Reid (@JoyAnnReid) March 13, 2018.

In this tweet MSNBC host Joy-Ann Reid references an appearance by Isikoff and Corn on the Rachel Maddow program. The authors previewed their new book in an interview with Rachel on 3/12/2018, during which they spoke about how Biden referred to what Trump is accused of in the Steele dossier as "treason".

Thoughts On The Alleged "Deep State" Anti tRump Conspiracy

The following is from the Deep State Wikipedia entry...

In the United States, the concept of a deep state is an entity which has been alleged to be involved in a coordinated effort by career government employees and others to influence state policy without regard for democratically elected leadership. It has often been dismissed by numerous media outlets and individuals as a conspiracy theory.

Yeah, I'm leaning toward labeling the "deep state" a conspiracy theory. Given the fact that I'd never heard of it before the ascendency of tRump. Seems like a convenient excuse for a weak president to explain why he isn't implementing his agenda. A so-called president who takes credit for his predecessor's economy in order to sell phony success to his dupes.

This is an administration built on lies. Like the lie that Obama had d0tard Tower wires tapped. Having total control of all three branches of government leaves nobody to blame for failures like "repeal and replace". Explaining why he and his deluded followers have latched onto this "deep state" baloney.

It's government employees belonging to the "deep state" club along with "obstructionist" Democrats who are preventing tRump from making America great again. Or throwing up roadblocks in a futile attempt to prevent tRrump from MAGAing. He'll win out eventually. That is what I guess the average still-loyal trumpazee believes, at least. But tRump does need someone to blame for his failures until he "drains the swamp". He's going to defeat the imaginary "deep state" and the "obstructionist" Democrats who have no ability to obstruct.

btw, when I say the deep state is "imaginary", I mean in the sense that tRump and his delusional followers are spinning it. I do believe that large governmental institutions protect themselves. Explaining why some things don't change regardless of whether it's Republicans or Democrats holding power. But a "deep state" made up of Obamaites/Leftists/globalists that are out to stop tRump from "draining the swamp" (something he isn't even trying to do)? It's a bunch of BS.

Luke's Revenge

If you do not get even, you are just a schmuck! -- DJT, 2007 quote from the "president elect". A hate-filled man who will have revenge on his mind as he enters the WH.

The hate-filled blog troll known as "Luke the Puke" (AKA TOM, AKA Steve) has shut down his blog. He is currently accepting comments from "team members only", meaning he will receive no more comments.

This jackass is absolutely giddy over the coming Trump presidency, and has been spamming liberal and conservative blogs with his smug I-told-you-so's. Even though he NEVER told anyone so. In his last post before the election results, he said "President Clinton will give us all plenty to complain about, except for the Kool-Aid drinking liberals who will see her election as the salvation of America".

He expected HRC to win the White House! Now he lies and says he knew all along that Secretary Clinton would lose.

Luke The Puke: What a bunch of crybabies! They shut down comments because they can't handle I told you so, or can't defend their hate they have been writing for over a year. They misread the American electorate proving they had no clue what they were talking about. The MSN and pollsters mislead Americans and even went so far to say Hillary would win in a landslide. These hate filled liberals are mean and stupid. (11/10/2016 AT 4:20 PM).

As an aside, in that it has nothing to do with this post but is interesting nonetheless, Luke said (in the thread from WYD the comment above is attached to) "I am not a white male". Something I TOTALLY suspect he's lying about. Just as he lied about having "brain cancer". The scumbag even told me (using his second TOM ID) that the other TOM had "died".

Sure. That's why Luke's writings match those of TOM so very closely. Also why 3 commentaries from TOM's Stay A While appear on Luke's Words And Music (swtd-357).

But lying is what blog trolls do! For example, in a Words And Music (WAM) blog post titled "Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi", Puke defended Secretary Clinton, writing that the "investigation" yeilded "no charges, just baseless accusations", yet (in a comment submitted to my blog) he wrote that "it's OK when crooked Hillary lies about Benghazi".

When I pointed this out to him, the delusional troll said "no contradictions here". Right (dsd-39).

Now, on his blog, he's too cowardly to accept comments from those he mocks. Even as he continues to send me comments like the following...

Luke: Hi Nazi Boy!! Did you get all your Jew hating buddies to believe you yet? You are as wrong about me as you were about Clinton winning. It's nice to see you proven not only wrong, but so delusional that you have no clue what your countrymen are all about. Good luck with your next wrong assessment of ANYTHING. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA What a fucking LOSER HA HA HA HA HA HA HA (11/11/16. Unpublished. Sent to Spam).

This is PURE delusion. *I'm* delusional because I "no clue what your countrymen are all about". When, from what he wrote, he CLEARLY also believed that Hillary Clinton would be our next president. As for "wrong assessments", I made NONE. I listened to the professional pollsters, and that HRC would be sent to the WH was their assessment. My assessment is that TOM, Steve and Luke are IDs all controlled by the same blog troll (swtd-357). An assessment I stand by.

This idiot started out as "Luke" by targeting various bloggers with bogus "plagiarism" charges. So why did he target specific bloggers? It isn't because any of them stole his posts, as he claims (swtd-346). That never happened. I know because he said I stole from him. But I don't want his garbage on my blog. I asked him to tell me what writings of his were on SWTD and I'd remove said writings immediately. He ignored me.

Proof he is a blog troll. As for the reason he targeted the specific people he targeted, he is motivated by revenge. Revenge for the "blog attacking" he imagined he endured while writing on his old blog Stay A While. "Due to Rational Nation attacking my blog with vulgar comments, I have had to install comment moderation. Assholes are everywhere" TOM wrote on 8/5/2010.

Later the imaginary "blog attackers" expanded to include previous readers and commenters on his blog. People who had said nice things about him. On 4/15/2010 Sue wrote, in regards to TOM's fake brain cancer, "Be well my friend!". And on 6/22/2010 she wrote "we've been praying!".

The kind of childish behavior of a Trump (who decided to run for potus after the jokes at his expense from President Obama at the White House Correspondent's Dinner).

Footnote
*From the 2007 book Think Big: Make It Happen in Business and Life by Donald J. Trump and Bill Zanker.

Orange Shift

At their best, provisional ballots provide voters who would otherwise be turned away from the polls to have their votes counted, but at their worst, the offer of a provisional ballot can be "a way to brush off troublesome voters by letting them think they have voted". It is possible for parties to force certain voters to cast provisional ballots so they can suppress the vote total of an opponent being counted on election night. (Source).

The following is an excerpt from the 11/11/2016 airing of the Thom Hartmann Radio Program (edited for brevity and clarity by me).

Thom Hartmann: Yesterday I said I was going to share these exit poll results with you, but I couldn't verify them. I've now seen them from 3 different sources. ... this came from CNN and is available through tdmsresearch.com (Exit Polls and Computerized Vote Counts.

What they're pointing out is that, in North Carolina, according to the exit polls, Hillary Clinton won by 2%. But according to the official count? Donald Trump won by 3.8% [5.8% swing]. How does that happen? How so you get that much of a swing, which probably swung the Senate race as well.

In Pennsylvania, the exit polls showed that Hillary Clinton won by 4.4%, and presumably the down ticket Democrats [won by a similar margin per the exit polls]. Yet the official count was that Donald Trump won by 1.1% [5.5% swing]. In Wisconsin, the exit polls showed that Hillary Clinton won by 3.9%. Yet the official count says Donald Trump won by 9/10th of a percent [aproximate 4% swing]. In Florida the exit polls showed that Hillary Clinton won by 1.4%. Yet the official count showed that Donald Trump won by 1.3% [2.7% swing].

If those four states had gone the way of the exit polls - North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida - Hillary Clinton would be president, and Democrats would control the Senate. A number of people are saying this is proof the voting machines are rigged. I think that the exit polls were probably right.

The Republicans for 40 years now -- this goes back to Paul Weyrich - have been pushing this idea that there's voter fraud out there, and therefore we need to take people off the voting rolls because they might fradulently vote. [Kansas Secretary of State] Kris Kobach has this list of roughly 7 million people, the Interstate Crosscheck, well funded by petro-billionaires. And he's got some 30-odd Republican controlled states working with him to throw people off the voting rolls [actual number of states that use the Interstate Crosscheck is 27].

As Greg Palast laid out here [on the program when he was a guest last week]. It's mostly people with common names. You get a "Jim Washington" in Wisconsin and a "James Washington" in Florida. According to Kris Kobach they're the same person. So take them both off the voter rolls. It's somebody trying to commit voter fraud.

When, in fact, it's just a common name among African Americans. Last names of "Hernandez", "Kim" or "Park". Ethnic names are among the most common now in the United States. As opposed to the old Anglo-Saxon ethnic names like "Smith" and "Jones". They are still common, but not like this.

People went in and thought they voted. But they weren't on the voter rolls and were given a provisional ballot which never got counted. Which swung an election. Like in North Carolina, but 5.8 points.

Luke Called The FBI

Luke: This troll, liar, plagiarist, and pure asshole has individual blogs attacking multiple individuals, claims I cut and paste every post and never write my own stuff, claims I'm 5 other people, and is just plain dirty nasty.

Over a 3 day period in August 2016, this dangerous person sent 100 comments (most sent at 3 am) about murder. I called the FBI. Of course his buddies (like RN) left comments at his blog cheering him on. These assholes are dangerous people.

9/3/16. He sent me another 100 comments, all written at 5am and he told me he was drunk. Another 100 comments 9/4/16.

Now I can add a death threat to me from this criminal. I'll leave the comment up for all to see.